The 2024 U.S. presidential election season has seen a significant influx of Chinese-manufactured campaign merchandise flooding the American market. Items such as “Make America Great Again” hats and “Kamala Harris 2024” apparel are being sold at substantially lower prices on platforms like Temu, with some hats priced under $4, compared to $40 on official campaign sites.

This surge of inexpensive imports poses challenges for U.S. manufacturers who adhere to higher labor and environmental standards, resulting in higher production costs. Ben Waxman, founder of American Roots, highlighted the difficulty in competing with the low prices of Chinese-made products, emphasizing that domestic production involves paying living wages and complying with environmental regulations.

The prevalence of these low-cost items is facilitated by the de minimis trade provision, which allows goods valued under $800 to enter the U.S. duty-free. This loophole has been exploited by Chinese sellers, leading to a market saturated with affordable election merchandise. Kim Glas, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations, noted that this exploitation has contributed to the closure of 21 domestic manufacturing operations over the past 18 months.

Both the Trump and Harris campaigns have committed to offering only U.S.-made products on their official websites. However, the vast availability of cheaper, foreign-made alternatives presents a significant challenge to these commitments, underscoring the complexities of enforcing domestic production standards in a globalized economy.

One of the American companies impacted by this influx is Unionwear, a New Jersey-based manufacturer specializing in union-made, American-made political merchandise. Unionwear has long been a key supplier for Democratic and labor-backed campaigns, producing high-quality, ethically sourced hats and apparel. However, the company faces growing competition from low-cost Chinese imports, which pose a major challenge to U.S. manufacturers that adhere to higher labor and environmental standards.

Despite these challenges, Unionwear remains committed to producing ethically sourced, union-made campaign gear, ensuring that supporters of U.S. political candidates have the option to purchase merchandise that aligns with their values. Both the Trump and Harris campaigns have pledged to sell only U.S.-made products on their official websites, but the widespread availability of foreign-made alternatives underscores the ongoing struggle for American manufacturers like Unionwear to maintain their foothold in the industry.

This situation highlights the broader issue of U.S. reliance on Chinese manufacturing and the difficulties domestic producers face in competing with low-cost imports, especially during high-demand periods like election seasons.

Read more here.