President Donald Trump, known for his “America First” policies, has vowed to reinstate and expand measures to bolster U.S. manufacturing, increase tariffs on imported goods, and provide tax incentives for domestic producers. But how would a Trump presidency actually impact the manufacturing sector?

During his 2016 presidency, Trump emphasized revitalizing American manufacturing through tariffs on imports, renegotiating trade deals, and incentivizing domestic production. His policies included imposing tariffs on Chinese imports and pushing for the USMCA trade deal, which replaced NAFTA. With his possible return to office, Trump has promised an even more aggressive stance on trade policies and economic incentives aimed at strengthening American industry.

One of Trump’s signature economic strategies is the imposition of tariffs on imported goods. In 2018, his administration placed tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese products, driving companies to reconsider their supply chains. If re-elected, Trump is likely to reinstate or even increase these tariffs.

Trump has proposed reducing corporate tax rates for U.S. manufacturers, potentially bringing the tax rate as low as 15%. This would make it more attractive for companies to invest in domestic production facilities rather than outsourcing jobs overseas. By lowering the tax burden on manufacturers, Trump aims to strengthen American industry and make it more competitive on a global scale.

Trump has consistently supported federal procurement policies that prioritize American-made goods. Under his leadership, companies that manufacture products in the U.S. could receive preference for government contracts, further driving demand for domestically produced items. This could significantly impact industries such as defense, construction materials, and workwear manufacturing.

Trump’s proposed policies could create a more self-sufficient and competitive U.S. manufacturing sector, but businesses must be ready for the potential drawbacks of protectionism and shifting trade dynamics. Whether these changes ultimately boost or burden domestic manufacturing will depend on how companies adapt to the evolving economic landscape.

As the 2024 election approaches, the future of “Made in USA” manufacturing hangs in the balance, making it critical for industry leaders to stay prepared for any political and economic shifts ahead.

The NJBIZ article “Made in the USA: What a Trump presidency could mean for domestic manufacturing” highlights Unionwear as a prime example of successful domestic production. Founded in 1992, Unionwear manufactures hats, bags, and other products entirely within the United States. Notably, the company has produced presidential campaign merchandise since President Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign and recently crafted camo hats for the Harris-Walz presidential campaign.

Read more here